The first two weeks of a presidency can set the tone for what’s to come. And if the early signs are any indication, this one might already be heading off track. The recent nomination of key figures has sparked serious debate and raised eyebrows across the political spectrum.

Take Kash Patel, for instance. His potential role as FBI director has left many uneasy. The idea of a leader who might “purge” the bureau of employees who don’t align with the administration’s ideology feels more like something out of a political thriller than real life. It’s a far cry from the independent leadership the FBI is known for.

Then there’s Tulsi Gabbard, whose past as a defender of controversial figures like Bashar al-Assad and Edward Snowden doesn’t exactly scream “trustworthy intelligence director.” And let’s not forget Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose history of medical misinformation and conspiracy theories makes him a questionable choice to lead the federal health system. It’s hard to imagine a more polarizing trio.

Will these nominees get confirmed? It’s a tough call. While some party moderates might push back, the administration’s track record suggests dissent isn’t exactly encouraged. For now, these choices serve as a stark reminder of the priorities shaping this presidency. Whether it’s loyalty, political gain, or something else entirely, the early days have left plenty to think about.