The Supreme Court has stepped in to give Brenda Andrew, the only woman on Oklahoma’s death row, a chance to challenge her conviction. The court raised concerns that prosecutors may have crossed a line by focusing heavily on her personal life during the trial. Andrew was found guilty of murdering her husband, but the court’s recent decision suggests her trial might have been unfair. Prosecutors brought up details about her relationships, her clothing choices, and even her underwear, which they argued showed she was guilty. During the 2004 trial, one prosecutor went as far as holding up Andrew’s thong underwear in front of the jury, claiming it proved she was planning to run off with her boyfriend after her husband’s death. The dramatic moment reportedly left the courtroom in shock. The Supreme Court’s unsigned opinion called out the prosecution’s tactics, saying they relied on “evidence about Andrew’s sex life and about her failings as a mother and wife.” This kind of information, the court suggested, could have unfairly swayed the jury. Now, an appeals court will take another look at the case to decide if the focus on Andrew’s personal life tainted the trial. This decision could have major implications for how evidence is used in future cases, especially when it comes to personal or sensitive details. For now, Andrew’s fate hangs in the balance as the legal process continues. The Supreme Court’s move highlights the importance of ensuring fair trials, even in the most high-stakes cases. ---