Quebec’s controversial law banning public-sector workers from wearing religious symbols is heading to Canada’s Supreme Court. The law, known as Bill 21, has been a hot topic since its introduction in 2019, with critics arguing it unfairly targets Muslim, Jewish, and Sikh individuals.

The law prohibits civil servants—such as teachers, police officers, and prosecutors—from wearing items like hijabs, turbans, or crosses while on the job. Supporters say it promotes secularism, a core value in Quebec’s government. However, opponents claim it violates fundamental rights protected by Canada’s constitution.

Quebec has leaned on a rare legal tool called the “notwithstanding clause” to sidestep constitutional challenges. This clause, added in 1981, allows governments to override certain rights to advance their own policies. Quebec has used it to enforce Bill 21, which Premier François Legault passionately defends as a safeguard of the province’s identity.

The debate over Bill 21 reflects Quebec’s unique history. The province has long moved away from the Catholic Church’s influence, which once shaped education and public services. During the 1960s “Quiet Revolution,” Quebec shifted toward secularization, and this law is seen by some as a continuation of that transformation.

As the Supreme Court prepares to weigh in, Canadians are watching closely. The decision could reshape the balance between religious freedom and provincial authority—and reignite a national conversation about what it means to live in a diverse society.